How to Debug Production: Handling Hot Fixes
Learn how to effectively handle production bugs and implement hotfixes with actionable steps, best practices, and tools for a seamless debugging process.
Handling live issues is one of the risky responsibilities of a software engineer, that all of us wish to never have to face dealing with.
This guide focuses on actionable steps to handle production bugs and implement hot fixes effectively, along with real-world use cases to illustrate best practices.
How to Decide If a Hot fix Is Needed
This is where fear usually takes over without a proper framework. I have seen cases where a hot fix was requested for a broken loader icon that had no impact on flow, Or for an issue that was affecting 2 users from our 500k monthly active users.
Bugs exist in every system and fixing them is essential for the user experience. But having hot fixes and late nights without the need to do so destroys team morale, and creates an unhealthy work environment.
To determine if a hot fix is necessary, I like to ask the following:
Is it costing us money?
Is it disrupting key user flows?
Is it harming trust or reputation?
Is it increasing operations effort or risking compliance?
If the impact is significant and the answer to any of the above is yes, I will prioritize the hot fix.
Be prepared before incidents happen
A framework to handle incidents does not look like something that would be prioritized until an issue actually happens. It is crucial to define a framework that guides the team on how to deal with a production incident. An effective framework ensures clarity and minimizes chaos when handling production bugs.
This is how to create an incident handling process
Define Severity Levels: Create criteria to classify incidents as Critical, High, or Low based on user impact. For example, a payment gateway outage is Critical, while a minor UI glitch may be Low. Questions mentioned above can help.
Escalation Workflows: Set clear paths for escalating issues, from on-call engineers to team leads or SRE teams.
Prepare Run books: Document step-by-step responses for common issues to guide engineers during incidents.
Monitoring and Detection for Engineers
Early detection of production issues minimizes its impact and speeds up resolution. Monitoring is a core part of engineering, relying on real-time dashboards and smart alerts to catch issues before users notice is crucial for a brand’s image, user experience.
It also prevents revenue loss which can make or break a company in its early days.Be proactive and set up tools that will help in early detection and debugging. This can be done by setting up the following:
Monitor Critical Metrics:
Track latency, error rates, and resource usage with tools like Grafana, New Relic, or Datadog.Set Smart Alerts:
Avoid alert fatigue by using actionable thresholds (e.g., “API error rate > 5% for 10 minutes”).Enhance Observability:
Use structured logs, traces, and metrics that are easily searchable for faster debugging.Automate Anomaly Detection:
Implement tools like Prometheus alert manager or ML-based systems to catch unusual patterns early.Debugging in Live Environments
Begin by examining logs and metrics to identify anomalies and narrow down potential root causes.I usually need to look at logs from different parts of the system to be able to create a pattern and understand the issue. The key goal here is to create a sequence of steps or pattern of actions that once it occurs the bug happens.
To do this we can use targeted debugging tools, such as trace analyzers or runtime loggers, to gather more insights directly from the production system.
Once we have this understanding we should aim to replicate the issue in a staging environment If possible to validate the findings and avoid risky live experimentation.
The following action items helps when debugging live:
Start with Logs and Metrics: Analyze structured logs and metrics to identify anomalies before making live changes.
Replicate Safely: Attempt to replicate the issue in a staging environment to confirm root causes without affecting users.
Use Feature Toggles: Temporarily disable problematic features or isolate the impact without rolling back the entire system.
Document Every Step: Record your debugging actions to create a clear trail for post-incident analysis.
Communication During Incidents
Keep updates clear and short. Share the issue, its impact, and when it will be fixed for example, “Payment processing is delayed due to a gateway issue; expected resolution in 30 minutes”. Use tools like Slack, PagerDuty, or StatusPage to communicate. Work closely with support teams to give users accurate updates. Make sure to only share confirmed details to avoid confusion.
Post-Incident Reviews for Engineers
A strong post-incident review is crucial for learning and preventing future issues. Following an approach of blameless postmortems, focus on system and process failures, not individual mistakes (e.g., “The alert threshold was too high to detect the issue sooner”).
What makes a good postmortem
A good postmortem should include a detailed timeline of events, root causes (technical, procedural, and human), and the incident’s impact. Ensure all findings are based on facts to avoid blame and to ensure a safe discussion environment.
To make postmortems actionable, define clear tasks such as refining alert thresholds, improving test coverage, or updating runbooks, this will foster a culture of continuous learning and resilience.
Define clear tasks: Refine alert thresholds, improve test coverage, update run books. Here is a guideline that I post about a production bug.
Standardize the process: define and use a common RCA templates that answers what happened, action taken, and how can we prevent it and lessons learned.
Prioritize tasks: Focus on high-impact action items first.
Track progress: Ensure all action items are completed.
Share insights: Distribute findings across teams to prevent similar issues.
Measure success: Use metrics like MTTR or incident recurrence rates.
Conclusion
Dealing with production bugs and hot fixes is as much about preparation and process as it is about technical expertise. By setting up robust incident response frameworks, leveraging monitoring tools, communicating effectively, and learning from incidents, software engineers can handle live issues confidently and minimize user impact. Embrace these practices to not only resolve issues faster but also build systems that are more resilient and reliable in the long run.
Support me in creating more content by subscribing !